This small yet effective change makes it look much more like a VMware product as opposed to the bolt-on appearance that both Integrien and previous VCOPs versions possessed. Compared with its predecessor, the most notable change with the VCOPs 5.0 GUI is its integration with vCenter's navigation and inventory pane. This collected data is then processed by the vCenter Operations Manager, Analytics VM, which presents the results through the rather colourful-looking GUI. So looking at the vCenter Operations Manager vApp (VCOPs), the first thing to note is that it collects data not only from VMware's vCenter Server but also from vCenter Configuration Manager as well as third-party data sources such as SNMP. The truth is that anyone who has had to troubleshoot a VMware environment, or gauge the capacity or performance, regardless of the size of the infrastructure, will testify that the default tools are simply not sufficient.Īdd the factor that more and more business-critical applications are now virtualised with virtual environments growing at an immense rate, then an enterprise-grade performance, capacity and monitoring tool is a necessity. To answer this, the first thing to do is to assess whether there is a need for such a tool, whether it's any good and what distinction, if any does it bring from the competition? But how much of that perception is related to its actual capabilities as opposed to VMware driving an agenda to monopolise a market segment that is clearly profitable? More than a year later, a huge marketing campaign and a revamped version, vCenter Operations 5.0 is slowly gaining traction among end users as the VM monitoring tool of choice. So, when in February 2011 VMware eventually did enter the monitoring market with the purchase of Integrien's Alive and its later relaunch and rebranding as vCenter Operations Manager, there wasn't anything majorly distinctive between what were already mature and in most cases cheaper solutions. Suddenly, every subsequent VMworld trade show grew not just by the number of attendees but by the number of VM-monitoring companies and tools, such as VKernel vOPS, Veeam Monitor, VMTurbo Operations Manager, Quest vFoglight and Xanagti VDI to name just a few. When VMware was only considered ideal for virtualising test and development environments, the native alarms and performance graphs of the then termed Virtual Center were more than adequate for general monitoring purposes.Īs the vSphere revolution began with the average customer having VMs numbering in the hundreds, VMware allowed a plethora of third-party performance and capacity tools to plug into vCenter via its software development kit. So with that need in mind, what is to be made of the huge marketing push for customers to adopt its virtual-machine monitoring tool, vCenter Operations 5.0? With VMworld 2012 fast approaching and VMware making serious manoeuvres into platform as a service (PaaS), a VMware-based cloud-monitoring product is a must. Helped ensure any unsavoury Larry Ellison comparisons were quickly put to bed.ĭespite that incident, it was still a signal of intent and an indication of VMware's recognition of its ever-growing clout. Is VMware slowly becoming the new Oracle? That was the question being asked after the backlash to its initial vRAM licensing model at the launch of vSphere 5.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |